roubaixtuesday wrote: 6 Feb 2026, 2:25pm
Because at that point, I was not aware of(and tbh found it hard to conceive of) anyone else sharing their opinion.
Whereas we now have, to my genuine astonishment, two of you.
You presumably became aware of Epstein's comments when you read the Independent article. When 853 pointed out that it was one newspaper journalist's interpretation, did you make no attempt to find other instances of journalists etc. similarly interpreting the remarks?
roubaixtuesday wrote: 6 Feb 2026, 3:29pm
It was just something I noticed incidentally, alas I didn't keep contemporaneous notes for posterity. Feel free to search bluesky.
Am loving the interrogation BTW, hope you are too.
I would have thought that you could find the link in your browser history, but never mind.
My main concern was your comment "I shall leave you to your singular and unique interpretion, entirely at odds to anyone else's". In future, please do not use rhetoric like that.
roubaixtuesday wrote: 6 Feb 2026, 3:29pm
It was just something I noticed incidentally, alas I didn't keep contemporaneous notes for posterity. Feel free to search bluesky.
Am loving the interrogation BTW, hope you are too.
I would have thought that you could find the link in your browser history, but never mind.
My main concern was your comment "I shall leave you to your singular and unique interpretion, entirely at odds to anyone else's". In future, please do not use rhetoric like that.
"The EU’s doubts as to whether future UK governments would abide by the terms of any “reset” agreement are reflected in the so-called ‘Farage clause’. First reported by The Guardian, this clause is intended to require financial compensation in the event that the UK reneges on its commitments – a scenario already anticipated by the leader of Reform UK".
Can we just rejoin, please? I'm quite fed up with having to stay in The UK for so long at one time, when I could be drinking (half decent) red wine at 90p a bottle.
PDQ Mobile wrote: 6 Feb 2026, 6:12pm
My interpretation is just that, the same as Roubaix's.
( and goodness know we don't always see things the same way! )