Page 2 of 2
Re: Cyclist want to be faster? hit floor
Posted: 3 Aug 2023, 1:23pm
by axel_knutt
Carburettors have a kick-down mechanism which squirts a jet of neat fuel into the manifold when you stamp suddenly on the throttle for overtaking and the like. Maximum power is not the same as maximum efficiency, so I doubt the optimum fuel/air ratio is going to be the same for maximum power as it is for maximum efficiency.
Re: Cyclist want to be faster? hit floor
Posted: 3 Aug 2023, 1:32pm
by Nearholmer
You’re right, it isn’t at all, and since maximum NOx output occurs at iirc maximum power, due to maximum temperature, there’s another peak to manage too, and a load of unburned fuel and particulate emissions to worry about as well, and preventing engine knock, and preventing intermittent misfiring.
Theoretical perfect combustion in a petrol engine is with a ratio of just under 15:1 by mass, but even in the best-designed engine that is unobtainable in practice, so with a modern engine management system the ratio in use at any moment probably varies from as a low as 9:1 at start and very sudden high demand, to a good deal over 15:1 on undemanding cruising where excess oxygen, or in some cases recirculated exhaust gas, is supplied to reduce NOx output. Most of the time it’s probably running c12:1.
Oh, and the ratios all have to change if the fuel changes significantly, because of different calorific values and burn characteristics.
In my previous, I was trying to find a form of words that conveyed the principle, and were also applicable to all internal combustion engines and to the fuel-air mix of external combustion (steam) engines too (not sure if I succeeded in the latter).
Anyway, this is all a bit more like a car or motorbike forum than a pushbike forum, and I’ll doubtless get in trouble if I keep talking about it.