Page 13 of 31
Re: Violent conflicts.
Posted: 3 Nov 2023, 5:20pm
by roubaixtuesday
Pebble wrote: 3 Nov 2023, 5:08pm
Tangled Metal wrote: 3 Nov 2023, 3:53pm
Pebble wrote: 3 Nov 2023, 8:47am
not sure it can be compared to Ukraine, Russia clearly invaded their country - for a comparison we would need protests about the Ukrainians fighting back.
Israel invaded when it took Golan heights and AFAIK at least part of the west Bank.
The difference between Israel and the other Arab on Arab conflicts is that those places were undemocratic basket cases at the time and were in state of war. Israel had periods of peace and democracy until Netanyahu joining up with the only groups who'd join with him such as extremist zionist and right wing parties. Corruption isn't an issue if it will support your illegal zionist /settler pov. If I was Israelis I'd hope we'd not be compared to Yemen and Syria personally. Says how bad Israel is that it's compared against Yemen!
the comparison was with the views of the far left, how they seem to turn a blind eye to Arabs killing each other in the hundreds of thousands. Then when Israel tries to defend itself the protests and hatred are soon out in force.
So back to my earlier question, why is this the case, why do we sometimes not care? Is it the media that leads us, or do the media just follow popular opinion and we get stuck into some feedback loop.
I just don't think your premise is true. For conflicts like Yemen, it's exactly the left who have been trying to draw attention to it.
So yes, we're not absolutely rational in what to pay attention to, but no, it's not a left/right divide or due to "hatred of Jews" as you and another poster have suggested.
However, I don't think it's at all irrational for the specific current Gaza war that it gets a lot of attention, for all sorts of reasons.
Re: Violent conflicts.
Posted: 3 Nov 2023, 5:33pm
by Mike Sales
Hamas's power and domination over Gaza are a creation of Netanyahu and his government, as described by
The Times of Israel.
For years, Netanyahu propped up Hamas. Now it’s blown up in our faces
The premier’s policy of treating the terror group as a partner, at the expense of Abbas and Palestinian statehood, has resulted in wounds that will take Israel years to heal from.
For years, the various governments led by Benjamin Netanyahu took an approach that divided power between the Gaza Strip and the West Bank — bringing Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas to his knees while making moves that propped up the Hamas terror group.
The idea was to prevent Abbas — or anyone else in the Palestinian Authority’s West Bank government — from advancing toward the establishment of a Palestinian state.
Thus, amid this bid to impair Abbas, Hamas was upgraded from a mere terror group to an organization with which Israel held indirect negotiations via Egypt, and one that was allowed to receive infusions of cash from abroad.
Hamas was also included in discussions about increasing the number of work permits Israel granted to Gazan laborers, which kept money flowing into Gaza, meaning food for families and the ability to purchase basic products.
Israeli officials said these permits, which allow Gazan laborers to earn higher salaries than they would in the enclave, were a powerful tool to help preserve calm.
https://www.timesofisrael.com/for-years ... our-faces/
In March 2019, Netanyahu told his Likud colleagues: “Anyone who wants to thwart the establishment of a Palestinian state has to support bolstering Hamas and transferring money to Hamas … This is part of our strategy – to isolate the Palestinians in Gaza from the Palestinians in the West Bank.”
If Israel had negotiated in good faith with the Palestinians the two state solution might have worked. Instead, they sabotaged it in order to take all the land, and, as we see, ethnically cleanse it.
Re: Violent conflicts.
Posted: 3 Nov 2023, 5:35pm
by reohn2
Mike Sales
Nail,head,on!
Again.
Re: Violent conflicts.
Posted: 3 Nov 2023, 5:38pm
by Jon in Sweden
I really wish there was a like function on this forum. Very good points Mike Sales.
It's all too often the case that the best way to power (and to hold power) is a create a common enemy. A constructive and progressive peace process doesn't win elections.
Netanyahu really does represent the very worst of Israel.
Re: Violent conflicts.
Posted: 3 Nov 2023, 5:57pm
by Mike Sales
In 2017, Israeli far-right parliamentarian Bezalel Smotrich proposed what he termed a “decisive plan” to end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Smotrich, who is now serving as finance minister in Netanyahu’s cabinet, argued (correctly) that the root of the conflict was competing claims to the same land from two distinct national groups. But, unlike his centrist peers, Smotrich claimed that these ambitions were incommensurable: that no territorial compromise could ever be reached between Israelis and Palestinians. In such a zero-sum conflict, one side has to win and the other has to lose.
The key to Israel winning such a total victory, he wrote, is simple: Break the Palestinians’ spirit.
“Terrorism derives from hope — a hope to weaken us,” Smotrich argued. “The statement that the Arab yearning for national expression in the Land of Israel cannot be ‘repressed’ is incorrect.”
Doing this, he continued, begins by annexing the West Bank and rapidly expanding Jewish settlements there. Once Israel has declared its intention to never let that land go, and created realities on the ground that make its withdrawal unimaginable, the Palestinians will reconcile themselves to the new reality — accept a second-class form of citizenship, leave voluntarily, or attempt violent resistance and be crushed.
Smotrich has used his time in Netanyahu’s cabinet to try to implement this plan — working both to de facto annex the West Bank and to rapidly expand Jewish settlement. The result has been the exact opposite of what Smotrich thought would happen: Atrocities by emboldened settler extremists ignited Palestinian anger. Atrocities committed by Palestinians led to settler retaliation, creating an unstable situation requiring a significant redeployment of Israel Defense Forces resources to the West Bank — whose raids themselves became a source of Palestinian grievance.
And that, per the Washington Post, is why those troops weren’t on Gaza’s border. Israel’s forces, who should have been defending against terrorists in Gaza, had been dragged to the West Bank as a consequence, at least in part, of the far right’s ideological project.
https://www.vox.com/23910085/netanyahu- ... ar-history
Re: Violent conflicts.
Posted: 3 Nov 2023, 6:29pm
by pwa
If declaring the current Israeli government extremist and barbaric is deemed anti-Semitic, we will all be deemed anti-Semitic soon. I have just been watching BBC coverage of the plight of civilians in Gaza, and it is appalling. Appalling on a scale way beyond the massacre committed by Hamas on October 7th. So decent people must stand up and say that what is happening is not justified by October 7th. Civilised people do not respond to a massacre by committing another massacre, only bigger. Civilised people do not show such callous indifference to the suffering and death of children. There is no excuse for this.
Time for our own politicians to develop backbones, I think.
Re: Violent conflicts.
Posted: 3 Nov 2023, 6:51pm
by Jon in Sweden
pwa wrote: 3 Nov 2023, 6:29pm
If declaring the current Israeli government extremist and barbaric is deemed anti-Semitic, we will all be deemed anti-Semitic soon. I have just been watching BBC coverage of the plight of civilians in Gaza, and it is appalling. Appalling on a scale way beyond the massacre committed by Hamas on October 7th. So decent people must stand up and say that what is happening is not justified by October 7th. Civilised people do not respond to a massacre by committing another massacre, only bigger. Civilised people do not show such callous indifference to the suffering and death of children. There is no excuse for this.
Time for our own politicians to develop backbones, I think.
Completely agree.
I have a lot of time to listen to podcasts at work, so have been following some of the phone ins on James O'Brian on LBC. On several occasions, there have been Israelis callers who have genuinely defended the IDFs actions and actually stated that the actions of the IDF weren't as bad as those of Hamas, even though in both instances children were killed. If you can't be horrified at the violent death of any child, there is something wrong with you.
In the interests of balance, there have been an equal number of Jewish callers who have (like the rest of us) expressed horror at the massacre in Gaza.
Re: Violent conflicts.
Posted: 3 Nov 2023, 10:01pm
by reohn2
pwa wrote: 3 Nov 2023, 6:29pm
If declaring the current Israeli government extremist and barbaric is deemed anti-Semitic, we will all be deemed anti-Semitic soon. I have just been watching BBC coverage of the plight of civilians in Gaza, and it is appalling. Appalling on a scale way beyond the massacre committed by Hamas on October 7th. So decent people must stand up and say that what is happening is not justified by October 7th. Civilised people do not respond to a massacre by committing another massacre, only bigger. Civilised people do not show such callous indifference to the suffering and death of children. There is no excuse for this.
Time for our own politicians to develop backbones, I think.
Quite!
However backbones are a scarce commodity in our political leaders these days,not to mention a lack of common decency and morality,more's the pity!
Re: Violent conflicts.
Posted: 3 Nov 2023, 10:25pm
by Pebble
Jon in Sweden wrote: 3 Nov 2023, 6:51pm
pwa wrote: 3 Nov 2023, 6:29pm
If declaring the current Israeli government extremist and barbaric is deemed anti-Semitic, we will all be deemed anti-Semitic soon. I have just been watching BBC coverage of the plight of civilians in Gaza, and it is appalling. Appalling on a scale way beyond the massacre committed by Hamas on October 7th. So decent people must stand up and say that what is happening is not justified by October 7th. Civilised people do not respond to a massacre by committing another massacre, only bigger. Civilised people do not show such callous indifference to the suffering and death of children. There is no excuse for this.
Time for our own politicians to develop backbones, I think.
Completely agree.
I have a lot of time to listen to podcasts at work, so have been following some of the phone ins on James O'Brian on LBC. On several occasions, there have been Israelis callers who have genuinely defended the IDFs actions and actually stated that the actions of the IDF weren't as bad as those of Hamas, even though in both instances children were killed. If you can't be horrified at the violent death of any child, there is something wrong with you.
In the interests of balance, there have been an equal number of Jewish callers who have (like the rest of us) expressed horror at the massacre in Gaza.
Do you think amongst the 700,000 killed in Yemen and Syria in recent years that there was no children involved, you remember when they were dropping the chemical weapons on the civilians - where you horrified then, did you protest ? or did it not matter as Israel was not involved?
JamesOBrian - do you really think that Looney Left Shock Jock is a balanced source of news ? jeez
Re: Violent conflicts.
Posted: 4 Nov 2023, 7:03am
by Jon in Sweden
Pebble wrote: 3 Nov 2023, 10:25pm
Do you think amongst the 700,000 killed in Yemen and Syria in recent years that there was no children involved, you remember when they were dropping the chemical weapons on the civilians - where you horrified then, did you protest ? or did it not matter as Israel was not involved?
JamesOBrian - do you really think that Looney Left Shock Jock is a balanced source of news ? jeez
You peddling (or should it be Pebbling?) in whataboutism.
I have enormous sympathy for what has happened in Yemen and Syria. Sweden has a great many Syrian refugees, so it's something that's closer to home here than in the UK.
I find there to be nothing leftist or shocking about James O'Brians coverage. He simply poses a question and invariably, those in firm support of Israel's massive overreaction tie themselves up in a knot of contradictions and double standards.
Re: Violent conflicts.
Posted: 4 Nov 2023, 7:25am
by Mike Sales
Yes Jon. Pebble's frantic whataboutery cannot distract attention from Netanyahu's genocide and ethnic cleansing.
He has nothing to say about how Israel built up Hamas deliberately and provoked the Palestinians in order to kill them and expel them from their land. My posts above detail this, but all he can say is 'what about...'. Atrocities elsewhere do not justify the horror going on in Gaza, and beginning in the West Bank.
Cannot he bring himself to condemn this murder of civilians?
I cannot imagine how the Hamas terrorists could bring themselves to murder at such close quarters, but inflicting the inevitable and horrible deaths on civilians and children from the air does not make murder less culpable.
Re: Violent conflicts.
Posted: 4 Nov 2023, 7:33am
by pwa
Pebble wrote: 3 Nov 2023, 10:25pm
Jon in Sweden wrote: 3 Nov 2023, 6:51pm
pwa wrote: 3 Nov 2023, 6:29pm
If declaring the current Israeli government extremist and barbaric is deemed anti-Semitic, we will all be deemed anti-Semitic soon. I have just been watching BBC coverage of the plight of civilians in Gaza, and it is appalling. Appalling on a scale way beyond the massacre committed by Hamas on October 7th. So decent people must stand up and say that what is happening is not justified by October 7th. Civilised people do not respond to a massacre by committing another massacre, only bigger. Civilised people do not show such callous indifference to the suffering and death of children. There is no excuse for this.
Time for our own politicians to develop backbones, I think.
Completely agree.
I have a lot of time to listen to podcasts at work, so have been following some of the phone ins on James O'Brian on LBC. On several occasions, there have been Israelis callers who have genuinely defended the IDFs actions and actually stated that the actions of the IDF weren't as bad as those of Hamas, even though in both instances children were killed. If you can't be horrified at the violent death of any child, there is something wrong with you.
In the interests of balance, there have been an equal number of Jewish callers who have (like the rest of us) expressed horror at the massacre in Gaza.
Do you think amongst the 700,000 killed in Yemen and
Syria in recent years that there was no children involved, you remember when they were dropping the chemical weapons on the civilians - where you horrified then, did you protest ? or did it not matter as Israel was not involved?
JamesOBrian - do you really think that Looney Left Shock Jock is a balanced source of news ? jeez
I remember very well the way the Syrian army conducted itself during the civil war, and unlike many I was in favour of Western intervention. The West lost its nerve, leaving the door wide open for Russia to step in and back up Assad's barbaric regime. And yes, many of us have been very critical of Saudi Arabia for its actions in Yemen. Also Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and the massacre committed by Hamas on October 7th. And now, in reprisal, Israel has thrown out of the window the rule book on how to conduct a war and is bombarding urban areas where large numbers of civilians are known to be. Are there any more you want added to the list? Speaking just for myself, I have been critical of Israeli governments for decades. But I have also been critical of Saudi Arabia and other non-democratic Arab regimes for decades. I am very critical of the Chinese "Big Brother" government. I used to be critical of the apartheid South African government. What is so special about Israel that it should be protected from my criticisms when I dislike the way it acts?
Re: Violent conflicts.
Posted: 4 Nov 2023, 9:02am
by francovendee
pwa wrote: 4 Nov 2023, 7:33am
Pebble wrote: 3 Nov 2023, 10:25pm
Jon in Sweden wrote: 3 Nov 2023, 6:51pm
Completely agree.
I have a lot of time to listen to podcasts at work, so have been following some of the phone ins on James O'Brian on LBC. On several occasions, there have been Israelis callers who have genuinely defended the IDFs actions and actually stated that the actions of the IDF weren't as bad as those of Hamas, even though in both instances children were killed. If you can't be horrified at the violent death of any child, there is something wrong with you.
In the interests of balance, there have been an equal number of Jewish callers who have (like the rest of us) expressed horror at the massacre in Gaza.
Do you think amongst the 700,000 killed in Yemen and
Syria in recent years that there was no children involved, you remember when they were dropping the chemical weapons on the civilians - where you horrified then, did you protest ? or did it not matter as Israel was not involved?
JamesOBrian - do you really think that Looney Left Shock Jock is a balanced source of news ? jeez
I remember very well the way the Syrian army conducted itself during the civil war, and unlike many I was in favour of Western intervention. The West lost its nerve, leaving the door wide open for Russia to step in and back up Assad's barbaric regime. And yes, many of us have been very critical of Saudi Arabia for its actions in Yemen. Also Russia's invasion of Ukraine, and the massacre committed by Hamas on October 7th. And now, in reprisal, Israel has thrown out of the window the rule book on how to conduct a war and is bombarding urban areas where large numbers of civilians are known to be. Are there any more you want added to the list? Speaking just for myself, I have been critical of Israeli governments for decades. But I have also been critical of Saudi Arabia and other non-democratic Arab regimes for decades. I am very critical of the Chinese "Big Brother" government. I used to be critical of the apartheid South African government. What is so special about Israel that it should be protected from my criticisms when I dislike the way it acts?
And that's the problem facing us and the politicians. How can you criticise the actions of the Israeli government without having the charge of being anti-semitic being thrown at you.
The actions of Hamas have rightly been widely condemned and shown how barbaric they are but the actions by Israel show deep down there is no difference.
What I find most worrying is that Israel has nuclear weapons. If Israel were faced with defeat I wonder would they be just as likely to use them as Russia.
Re: Violent conflicts.
Posted: 4 Nov 2023, 9:24am
by pwa
francovendee wrote: 4 Nov 2023, 9:02am
.......And that's the problem facing us and the politicians. How can you criticise the actions of the Israeli government without having the charge of being anti-semitic being thrown at you.....
I think we have to risk it, if that is the price of speaking up. I know I am not anti-Semitic. I don't have adverse feelings about people who happen to be Jewish. I don't even have adverse feelings about people who happen to be Israelis. But I do have things to say about an Israeli army that does not take sufficient care to prevent harm to civilians. And if people choose to view such criticism as anti-Semitic, they are wrong.
Re: Violent conflicts.
Posted: 4 Nov 2023, 9:51am
by djnotts
pwa wrote: 3 Nov 2023, 6:29pm
If declaring the current Israeli government extremist and barbaric is deemed anti-Semitic, we will all be deemed anti-Semitic soon. I have just been watching BBC coverage of the plight of civilians in Gaza, and it is appalling. Appalling on a scale way beyond the massacre committed by Hamas on October 7th. So decent people must stand up and say that what is happening is not justified by October 7th. Civilised people do not respond to a massacre by committing another massacre, only bigger. Civilised people do not show such callous indifference to the suffering and death of children. There is no excuse for this.
Time for our own politicians to develop backbones, I think.
Just so, very well put.
Wonder what the charges/penalties will be for those who are so deemed......