531colin wrote: 6 Jun 2024, 8:19am
Brucey wrote: 5 Jun 2024, 8:44pm
I think you might have misunderstood; when the polar MOI is increased, it doesn't matter how much you move around, the bike won't track the bumps in the same way.
The bike is a few kilos heavier, so yeah, it won’t move in EXACTLY the same way, but I still prefer to put my weight on my feet rather than get a huge kick up the bum at every bump.
I don't know why we have to take these discussions to the extreme, the OP is asking about a shopping utility bike, not an off-roader. On that sort of bike, I'll unweight the saddle for a pothole I can't avoid, the rest of the time, on road surfaces that are far from smooth but not producing huge kicks, I have more weight on the saddle (As a consequence of putting less effort into the pedalling). I appreciate a bike designed to take that into consideration. I didn't think this was some controversial theory, utility bikes have taken this into consideration long before electrification, look at the popularity of sprung saddles. I thought Dutch Utility cycling described it well, for anyone who doesn't understand what that is, there's Google.
It’s a lifetime ago that I last rode an off road motorcycle but as somebody said, the principle is similar; off road motorcycles are ridden almost exclusively standing on the foot pegs: some scramblers don’t look like you could ride them seated.
How many motorcyclist do you see riding like that while out shopping? In areas where the motorbike fulfils a large part of the transport needs (I'm thinking of parts of Asia) the bikes of choice are feet forward motor scooters in the Vespa or Honda Cub style , not scrambler or trials bikes.