Internal rim wear indicators

For discussions about bikes and equipment.
gregoryoftours
Posts: 2371
Joined: 22 May 2011, 7:14pm

Internal rim wear indicators

Post by gregoryoftours »

Found a hole in my Mavic A319 rim, to my surprise it's actually a wear indicator, but internal only, no divot or channel in the outer rim surface. Quite neat! No sign or mark until the rim is ready for replacement
IMG_20240622_185236.jpg
IMG_20240622_185312.jpg
The front rim is not quite there yet:
IMG_20240622_190118.jpg
I remember that I got a real shock once checking somebody's bike over and their rim had a gap the whole way around that you could stick a screwdriver in, due to the design of wear indicators on Rigida rims.
Brucey
Posts: 46526
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Internal rim wear indicators

Post by Brucey »

it isn't a bad design, is it?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
User avatar
plancashire
Posts: 953
Joined: 22 Apr 2007, 10:49am
Location: Düsseldorf, Germany

Re: Internal rim wear indicators

Post by plancashire »

Brucey wrote: 22 Jun 2024, 7:07pm it isn't a bad design, is it?
Not bad? It is far superior to the exterior circumferential groove for two reasons. It doesn't reduce the surface area for braking. It is a positive indication: a hole looks bad. If you never noticed that your rim had grooves and you take it to a workshop and it now has no grooves, is it worn out or just never had grooves?
I am NOT a cyclist. I enjoy riding a bike for utility, commuting, fitness and touring on tout terrain Rohloff, Brompton ML3 (2004) and Wester Ross 354 plus a Burley Travoy trailer.
User avatar
Cugel
Posts: 6325
Joined: 13 Nov 2017, 11:14am

Re: Internal rim wear indicators

Post by Cugel »

plancashire wrote: 22 Jun 2024, 9:18pm
Brucey wrote: 22 Jun 2024, 7:07pm it isn't a bad design, is it?
Not bad? It is far superior to the exterior circumferential groove for two reasons. It doesn't reduce the surface area for braking. It is a positive indication: a hole looks bad. If you never noticed that your rim had grooves and you take it to a workshop and it now has no grooves, is it worn out or just never had grooves?
Shoulda got disc brakes. :-)
“Practical men who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence are usually the slaves of some defunct economist”.
John Maynard Keynes
Nearholmer
Posts: 5834
Joined: 26 Mar 2022, 7:13am

Re: Internal rim wear indicators

Post by Nearholmer »

Smart. Very.
cycle tramp
Posts: 4700
Joined: 5 Aug 2009, 7:22pm

Re: Internal rim wear indicators

Post by cycle tramp »

Cugel wrote: 22 Jun 2024, 9:40pm
plancashire wrote: 22 Jun 2024, 9:18pm
Brucey wrote: 22 Jun 2024, 7:07pm it isn't a bad design, is it?
Not bad? It is far superior to the exterior circumferential groove for two reasons. It doesn't reduce the surface area for braking. It is a positive indication: a hole looks bad. If you never noticed that your rim had grooves and you take it to a workshop and it now has no grooves, is it worn out or just never had grooves?
Shoulda got disc brakes. :-)
Okay... all the disc-ies on that side of the room (look, you can fight about whether or not cable or hydraulics are better, later) everyone else, the other side.... ah, the guys with the lost, bewildered expressions, er.... that's both of you- you must be the drum brake team.. its up to you which side your on, its not like anyone's really listening.....
....okay, everyone just check that no bricks, barbed wire, or explosives have 'magically' appeared in your handbags...
Okay, on the blow of the whistle...
Dedicated to anyone who has reached that stage https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Vqbk9cDX0l0 (please note may include humorous swearing)
scottg
Posts: 1293
Joined: 10 Jan 2008, 8:44pm
Location: Highland Heights Kentucky,, USA

Re: Internal rim wear indicators

Post by scottg »

Cugel wrote: 22 Jun 2024, 9:40pm Shoulda got disc brakes. :-)
Specialized is going to reinvent spoon brakes,
but hydraulic. :)
Never wear out a disc, rim or brake pad again.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Deutsche Luftschiffahrts-AG
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
Brucey
Posts: 46526
Joined: 4 Jan 2012, 6:25pm

Re: Internal rim wear indicators

Post by Brucey »

Cugel wrote: 22 Jun 2024, 9:40pm
plancashire wrote: 22 Jun 2024, 9:18pm
Brucey wrote: 22 Jun 2024, 7:07pm it isn't a bad design, is it?
Not bad? It is far superior to the exterior circumferential groove for two reasons. It doesn't reduce the surface area for braking. It is a positive indication: a hole looks bad. If you never noticed that your rim had grooves and you take it to a workshop and it now has no grooves, is it worn out or just never had grooves?
Shoulda got disc brakes. :-)
naaah, he'd probably have been better off with drum brakes, wouldn't he?..... :wink: :wink:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Brucey~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
jimlews
Posts: 1635
Joined: 11 Jun 2015, 8:36pm
Location: Not the end of the world.

Re: Internal rim wear indicators

Post by jimlews »

The next big thing:
Wireless electronic braking !
What could possibly go wrong ?
axel_knutt
Posts: 3673
Joined: 11 Jan 2007, 12:20pm

Re: Internal rim wear indicators

Post by axel_knutt »

gregoryoftours wrote: 22 Jun 2024, 6:57pmFound a hole in my Mavic A319 rim, to my surprise it's actually a wear indicator
How old is it, they stopped putting those on at least 15 years ago. The T520 I bought in 2002 has them, as does an A719 from 2006, but neither of the A719s I bought in 2009 & 2012 have them. Considering Chris Juden's comments in the CTC mag below, I've always assumed they must have been forced to remove them for infringing someone else's patent.
.
T520 CTC March 2002.jpg
“I'm not upset that you lied to me, I'm upset that from now on I can't believe you.”
― Friedrich Nietzsche
torrens
Posts: 40
Joined: 15 Mar 2012, 11:51am

Re: Internal rim wear indicators

Post by torrens »

jimlews wrote: 23 Jun 2024, 11:01am The next big thing:
Wireless electronic braking !
What could possibly go wrong ?
The ABS, if you don’t change the fluid frequently enough? 😀
User avatar
gaz
Posts: 14650
Joined: 9 Mar 2007, 12:09pm
Location: Kent

Re: Internal rim wear indicators

Post by gaz »

Untitled.png
Wear indicator, when the whole appears you need a new bike :wink: .
gregoryoftours
Posts: 2371
Joined: 22 May 2011, 7:14pm

Re: Internal rim wear indicators

Post by gregoryoftours »

gaz wrote: 23 Jun 2024, 8:23pm Untitled.png
Wear indicator, when the whole appears you need a new bike :wink: .
Oh yes! I didn't realize that it's actually indicated on the label. It is on mine too, I just never noticed.

In reply to the question about the age of the wheels, they are probably at least 15 years old, I got them as a spare set of wheels with an old 90s Dawes galaxy I bought on eBay years ago. They have Cannondale hubs with cartridge bearings . Never got around to using them until a couple of years ago.

I had a couple of A319 in store as replacement and you are quite right, they don't have these indicators. A bit of a shame as they were a very neat and unobtrusive solution. I really don't like the painted channel that runs right around the braking surface of many other rims.
User avatar
plancashire
Posts: 953
Joined: 22 Apr 2007, 10:49am
Location: Düsseldorf, Germany

Re: Internal rim wear indicators

Post by plancashire »

What is the usual thickness of rims when new? Or is there no such norm? I ask because I have just measured the rims on my old Brompton (2004) and find they are 1.33 mm. They have no wear indicators; hole or groove, but I assume this is safe. If I knew the original thickness I could estimate the rate of wear and predict their remaining lifetime, which could well be longer than mine. :D
I am NOT a cyclist. I enjoy riding a bike for utility, commuting, fitness and touring on tout terrain Rohloff, Brompton ML3 (2004) and Wester Ross 354 plus a Burley Travoy trailer.
LWaB
Posts: 168
Joined: 26 Nov 2010, 5:33am

Re: Internal rim wear indicators

Post by LWaB »

Somewhere around 0.7-0.8mm remnant thickness is as much as I dare. I have failed a rim that got slightly below 0.7mm.
Post Reply