slowster wrote: 26 Aug 2025, 5:10pm
It is not a blanket ban. Only VPN servers that are used by those attempting to post spam etc. are blocked: they are banned on a reactive and targeted basis. Today there have been two attempts using VPNs to post spam on the forum, and consequently they have been blocked.
I think it is most unwise to access the internet without a VPN, and Cycling UK forum should not be telling people to switch them off and use their own, identifiable IP address instead:
viewtopic.php?t=163662
Were a commercial organisation to do so, it would almost certainly result in action by the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).
I use my VPN (Mozilla / Firefox) to access the internet to pay bills, make purchases, bank accounts, investments, tax returns etc ... but I cannot make a comment on Cycling UK Forum - or even view the site - using a VPN.
This is not consistent, thankfully.
So I was "permanently banned etc" a few minutes ago, swapped the VPN to Paris and back to London and now have access (via Chrome not Firefox) and can log in and make a comment.
I am astonished that targetting VPNs is the approach here, or blocking IPs that are obviously used by legitimate users (millions of people use the VPN of Mozilla, a charity, and it is my way of contributing to this organisation that campaigns for a non-nobbled, free expression internet).
I run three websites with WordPress, with well used comment sections, and the spam filters are very effective. Only very occasionally does someone make contact because their comment has not been published. It is usually because of email address formulation or content (usually links), and never because of a VPN.
(I have blocked and moderate about a dozen IP addresses, but they do belong to specific people - unfortunately, they have a habit of making malicious or defamatory comments about people or organisations in the public policy sector that I am engaged with.)
No one, of course, should think that their comments on the internet are anonymous, and courts have repeatedly issued "Norwich pharmacal orders" to indentify IP addresses of allegedly malicious commentors.
This law firm offers an explanation:
https://www.mills-reeve.com/publication ... orders-go/
I do not wish to leave a trail of my home IP address around the internet, and certainly do not want it known by some commercial practitioners in the sector I am engaged in.
I think Cycling UK Forum needs to think this through.