Analogies can be with other cases with good data, it does not imply comparisons with anecdotes. Fallacy of analogy is when the analogy is inappropriate, not a proscription against any analogies.Jdsk wrote: 13 Nov 2025, 11:41am
How can analogy do that? Looking at the data can.
But choosing whether or not to use protection in one setting shouldn't be determined by whether there's greater harm in a different setting.
When it comes to the question of whether an intervention is a proportionate one (which is not the same as whether it's effective) it's entirely valid to consider existing intervention thresholds in comparable matters, in this case other transport modes and daily activities. From a public policy perspective rather than a purely academic one I'd suggest it's rather negligent not to consider such matters.
A major issue with this subject is that question was completely skipped over on the basis of 'common sense', vibes and anecdotes.