Frame flex

For discussions about bikes and equipment.
Post Reply
sirmy
Posts: 608
Joined: 11 Mar 2009, 10:53am

Frame flex

Post by sirmy »

This has probably been done to death but how much flex would you normally expect in a steel frame.

My venerable 20 year old bike has what appears to be a couple of inches, certainly more than 1 inch, when the bottom bracket is pushed sideways.

I have considered replacing the frame (most of the components being under 2 years old) with a Surly long haul trucker but have read posting about the amount of flex in that frame.

An opinions/advice/blind prejudice for or against aluminium welcome :wink:
User avatar
Mick F
Spambuster
Posts: 56390
Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 11:24am
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall

Re: Frame flex

Post by Mick F »

My previous steel frames, including my precious 23 year old Mercian Vincitore, have always flexed when you bush your foot against the bb.

Perhaps an inch or so.
Mick F. Cornwall
stewartpratt
Posts: 2566
Joined: 27 Dec 2007, 5:12pm

Re: Frame flex

Post by stewartpratt »

sirmy wrote:My venerable 20 year old bike has what appears to be a couple of inches, certainly more than 1 inch, when the bottom bracket is pushed sideways.

I have considered replacing the frame (most of the components being under 2 years old) with a Surly long haul trucker but have read posting about the amount of flex in that frame.


And how are you measuring your flex? ie are you eliminating such factors as tyre deformation, lateral wheel flex, fork flex, crank flex, etc etc. I sincerely doubt your BB shell moves two inches with the head tube and rear dropouts held absolutely fast - unless you've had one or two tubes separate from each other altogether.

Having had a Trucker, it's just fine - I certainly didn't notice any excessive/untoward flex at all.
User avatar
Mick F
Spambuster
Posts: 56390
Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 11:24am
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall

Re: Frame flex

Post by Mick F »

I'm measuring mine by pressing my foot against the centre of the chainset whilst holding the saddle and the 'bars.

I look down and see about an inch in movement.

The wheels don't flex and neither do the forks or tyres.
(Don't get me on to tyre movement/distortion, because they don't !!!!!! )

It is just the main tubes that flex.
Mick F. Cornwall
rogerzilla
Posts: 3125
Joined: 9 Jun 2008, 8:06pm

Re: Frame flex

Post by rogerzilla »

You get some of the flex back through the cranks on the "return stroke", although the rest is lost in tyre scrub. Personally I'm not worried about flex unless it allows the brakes to rub or (in the case of my old Thorn) causes the gears to change themselves.
stewartpratt
Posts: 2566
Joined: 27 Dec 2007, 5:12pm

Re: Frame flex

Post by stewartpratt »

Mick F wrote:(Don't get me on to tyre movement/distortion, because they don't !!!!!! )


Don't worry, I've managed to resist getting involved in that thread and have no intention of resurrecting it here ;)
User avatar
Mick F
Spambuster
Posts: 56390
Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 11:24am
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall

Re: Frame flex

Post by Mick F »

rogerzilla wrote:You get some of the flex back through the cranks


I'm not pressing the cranks.
Mick F. Cornwall
rogerzilla
Posts: 3125
Joined: 9 Jun 2008, 8:06pm

Re: Frame flex

Post by rogerzilla »

Ah, but if you were riding, you would be. Frame steel is pretty good as a spring.
epicurus
Posts: 22
Joined: 14 Aug 2007, 10:15am

Re: Frame flex

Post by epicurus »

rogerzilla wrote:Ah, but if you were riding, you would be. Frame steel is pretty good as a spring.


Yeah. What is wrong with a bit of flex? If you are flexing something that is reasonably efficient as a spring, i.e. the energy put into flexing is largely returned by the unflexing, then outside of Cavendish style sprint situations, I don't see the problem. The idea put forward by the cycling comics that flex is somehow lost energy is completely wrong.
User avatar
Mick F
Spambuster
Posts: 56390
Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 11:24am
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall

Re: Frame flex

Post by Mick F »

Ah, Rogerzilla and you are right of course!

My experiment was as described without riding:
I'm measuring mine by pressing my foot against the centre of the chainset whilst holding the saddle and the 'bars. ......I look down and see about an inch in movement.......The wheels don't flex and neither do the forks or tyres......It is just the main tubes that flex.

Great stuff!
Mick F. Cornwall
sirmy
Posts: 608
Joined: 11 Mar 2009, 10:53am

Re: Frame flex

Post by sirmy »

Thanks, that reduces the paranoia a bit. I was a bit worried in case excessive flex could be a sign that the frame could be on it's way out.

Just a note, I haven't measured the amount of flex exactly but placed my foot on the top of the crank arm on the non chainset side and pushed, didn't gauge how much force I used, and judged the amount of flex by eye
User avatar
Spinners
Posts: 1678
Joined: 6 Dec 2008, 6:58pm
Location: Port Talbot

Re: Frame flex

Post by Spinners »

A mate of mine had a Duralinox frame and used to do the bottom bracket flex thing with it. Seriously bendy!!
Cycling UK Life Member
PBP Ancien (2007)
User avatar
Mick F
Spambuster
Posts: 56390
Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 11:24am
Location: Tamar Valley, Cornwall

Re: Frame flex

Post by Mick F »

Yes, I have a Floosey of a Duralinox. They are described ad "noodle-y"!

A wonderful ride. It makes into a very light bike. When my Mercian was having a re-paint for it's 21st birthday, I transferred all my Chorus Triple stuff onto it, and rode it for a few weeks. Fantastic!

The compete bike weighed 19 pounds or thereabouts. It was comfortable despite having 74degree aggressive geometry. It absorbed the bumps and roughness on the roads, it was responsive and fast, and a joy to ride.
Mick F. Cornwall
Post Reply