The Tax Advice Scandal
Posted: 28 Mar 2010, 9:01am
of all the aspects of the pro campaign that have caused me to question whether this is the club for me, the Tax Advice Scandal comes top by a long way. I can live with the sniping comments (just) and the steamroller management of the 'debate' in the magazine, but the Tax Advice thing has me reaching for solicitors telephone numbers.
Here's the deal. The CTC paid for tax advice on the Trust/Club takeover. That advice was presented to Council on the 27th February of this year (afficionados of this debate will wonder why if, as David Robinson tells us, this has been on the go for the last five years, it took that long to get proper advice on the supposed big benefit of charity status, but, there you go...). Now when I say 'the CTC paid for tax advice' I mean that you, the members, paid for it.
So where is it? I don't mean the amended for commercial confidentiality stuff, I mean the advice red in tooth and claw. The advice that apparently had one member of Council storm out of the meeting. The advice that had councillors proposing that members should be given an 'executive summary' (a proposition that was given short shrift by Kevin Mayne, I'm pleased to say). I want to see it, the original, unvarnished, unexpurgated report, the one we paid for.....
Here's the deal. The CTC paid for tax advice on the Trust/Club takeover. That advice was presented to Council on the 27th February of this year (afficionados of this debate will wonder why if, as David Robinson tells us, this has been on the go for the last five years, it took that long to get proper advice on the supposed big benefit of charity status, but, there you go...). Now when I say 'the CTC paid for tax advice' I mean that you, the members, paid for it.
So where is it? I don't mean the amended for commercial confidentiality stuff, I mean the advice red in tooth and claw. The advice that apparently had one member of Council storm out of the meeting. The advice that had councillors proposing that members should be given an 'executive summary' (a proposition that was given short shrift by Kevin Mayne, I'm pleased to say). I want to see it, the original, unvarnished, unexpurgated report, the one we paid for.....