Cycling UK Forum

The latest "new" thing in Newsnet - it's going to be called Cycle Clips ...now that's a REAL step forward for cycling in the 21st Century. Give me strength.

... as an aside the first item "Why vote once when you can vote twice?" caused a double-take ... I thought for a moment a new "standing order" (whatever that is) had been created to allow duplicate votes

Rob

EDIT : I just got a second copy of Newsnet this week ... is that extra votes I can have?

robgul wrote:The latest "new" thing in Newsnet - it's going to be called Cycle Clips ...now that's a REAL step forward for cycling in the 21st Century. Give me strength.

... as an aside the first item "Why vote once when you can vote twice?" caused a double-take ... I thought for a moment a new "standing order" (whatever that is) had been created to allow duplicate votes

Rob

Perhaps that's the only way they think they'll win the vote... they're resorting to other pretty desperate measures.

Whilst the new title did make me have similar thoughts, I'm not seeing why the name or format of the weekly news letter is really that relevant to the Charity debate? Perhaps this thread would be better placed elsewhere as people have enough to sift through in this section already? However, if anyone would care to point out why it is relevant then I'm happy to leave it.

Si wrote:Whilst the new title did make me have similar thoughts, I'm not seeing why the name or format of the weekly news letter is really that relevant to the Charity debate? Perhaps this thread would be better placed elsewhere as people have enough to sift through in this section already? However, if anyone would care to point out why it is relevant then I'm happy to leave it.

I put it there because it's the double-take "two vote" message that is a bit misleading ... and it's perhaps this sort of thinking (the name) that's at the heart of what's wrong with the overall enterprise ... I thought it was supposed to move forward?

Rob