Skyride
Posted: 26 Jul 2010, 2:22pm
While this my be missing the point... the adverts for Skyrides offer traffic-free cycling with thousands of cyclists. This is an obvious contradiction.
This isn't just a pedantic point (honest), language matters when producing and confirming perception and prejudice. When I am cycling I expect to be treated the same, roughly, as other road users or, to put it another way, as part of the traffic. To imply that traffic only means motor-vehicles is to suggest that cycles are not part of "traffic"; that they are of a different class. Being in a different class would be fine if this meant that extra consideration is given because of our lack of steel and glass protection; however, I fear that a slightly more negative understanding of us-and-them will be being reaffirmed. As far as I am concerned, I am a (slow) vehicle.
Notwithstanding, anything to get more folk using bikes is positive.
Any thoughts?
This isn't just a pedantic point (honest), language matters when producing and confirming perception and prejudice. When I am cycling I expect to be treated the same, roughly, as other road users or, to put it another way, as part of the traffic. To imply that traffic only means motor-vehicles is to suggest that cycles are not part of "traffic"; that they are of a different class. Being in a different class would be fine if this meant that extra consideration is given because of our lack of steel and glass protection; however, I fear that a slightly more negative understanding of us-and-them will be being reaffirmed. As far as I am concerned, I am a (slow) vehicle.
Notwithstanding, anything to get more folk using bikes is positive.
Any thoughts?