Butterfly bars vs high drops (or narrow butterflys)

For discussions about bikes and equipment.
SA_SA_SA
Posts: 2418
Joined: 31 Oct 2009, 1:46pm

Butterfly bars vs high drops (or narrow butterflys)

Post by SA_SA_SA »

I noticed the technical queries page mentioned Butterfly bars:

However, what about simply mounting drop bars higher?

Also straight-wit-bar-ends / butterfly bars are usually wider (than drops) hence any wrists parallel to travel position is wider than is ideal:

so if high drops still no good, why not narrow butterfly bars, with brakes on that "wrists parallel to travel position":

(in past this would have had advantage of allowing mtn bike V brake levers, but now good drop bar V levers are made by Tektro).
------------You may not use this post in Cycle or other magazine ------ 8)
User avatar
hubgearfreak
Posts: 8212
Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 4:14pm

Re: Butterfly bars vs high drops (or narrow butterflys)

Post by hubgearfreak »

and then there's moustache bars. i've got them on two of my three working bikes, and i know i'm not their only fan
User avatar
horizon
Posts: 11275
Joined: 9 Jan 2007, 11:24am
Location: Cornwall

Re: Butterfly bars vs high drops (or narrow butterflys)

Post by horizon »

SA_SA_SA wrote:However, what about simply mounting drop bars higher?



Join the club SA_SA_SA! And obtain a stem raiser if necessary - all the bike shops sell them because the demand is unlimited - every touring bike sold in fact. A nice little earner for Delta and the rest. Don't forget that butterfly bars require you to brake at the centre where you lose all the steering advantage of wider bars at a critical moment. Barmy.
When the pestilence strikes from the East, go far and breathe the cold air deeply. Ignore the sage, stay not indoors. Ho Ri Zon 12th Century Chinese philosopher
User avatar
531colin
Posts: 17103
Joined: 4 Dec 2009, 6:56pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: Butterfly bars vs high drops (or narrow butterflys)

Post by 531colin »

Bike fitting D.I.Y. .....http://wheel-easy.org.uk/wp-content/upl ... -2017a.pdf
Tracks in the Dales etc...http://www.flickr.com/photos/52358536@N06/collections/
Remember, anything you do (or don't do) to your bike can have safety implications
Freddie
Posts: 2550
Joined: 12 Jan 2008, 12:01pm

Re: Butterfly bars vs high drops (or narrow butterflys)

Post by Freddie »

It's a shame the majority of non-racing frames cannot be fitted with the handlebars at a decent height without purchasing add-ons. Still, I suppose it's yet another thing to make money on.
User avatar
531colin
Posts: 17103
Joined: 4 Dec 2009, 6:56pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: Butterfly bars vs high drops (or narrow butterflys)

Post by 531colin »

Freddie wrote:It's a shame the majority of non-racing frames cannot be fitted with the handlebars at a decent height without purchasing add-ons. Still, I suppose it's yet another thing to make money on.



Show a customer 2 bikes.
One has low gears, mudguards, carrier, comfortable riding position.
Other is shiny, looks like the sexy bikes he sees the pros riding on the telly, and is CHEAPER.
Guess which he buys?
2 months later he is on here ........gears too high, backache, toe overlap, you know the rest
Bike fitting D.I.Y. .....http://wheel-easy.org.uk/wp-content/upl ... -2017a.pdf
Tracks in the Dales etc...http://www.flickr.com/photos/52358536@N06/collections/
Remember, anything you do (or don't do) to your bike can have safety implications
hartleymartin
Posts: 444
Joined: 2 Sep 2009, 12:57pm
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: Butterfly bars vs high drops (or narrow butterflys)

Post by hartleymartin »

"Nitto Technomic Stem" - They are very long. In fact you can get 16cm above the minimum insertion mark. They also come in a variety of reach lengths from about 5 to 12cm.
Martin Hartley from Sydney, Australia
Self-confessed Raleigh Twenty tragic.
http://raleightwenty.webs.com
User avatar
CREPELLO
Posts: 5559
Joined: 29 Nov 2008, 12:55am

Re: Butterfly bars vs high drops (or narrow butterflys)

Post by CREPELLO »

Butterfly's are good, but the choice in the UK is poor. I also suspect they may be more vulnerable to fatigue unless the alloy is hardened. Because they are pretty wide, the leverage effect of hauling a loaded tourer up a steep hill has more of an effect around the stem clamp. I've rejected 3 pairs because of distortion and abrasion (brinelling?) around the bar clamp and ultimately changed to drops because of this.
Freddie
Posts: 2550
Joined: 12 Jan 2008, 12:01pm

Re: Butterfly bars vs high drops (or narrow butterflys)

Post by Freddie »

My feeling is that butterfly bars are too wide and perhaps the wrong shape. The sides are where you'd want your hands most of the time, but many bars angle out too much and this is rarely where the brake levers are positioned. If they could be made about 46cm, rather than 56cm wide and perhaps have the forward section removed at least made less pronounced, it'd be a significant improvement.
531colin wrote:Show a customer 2 bikes.
One has low gears, mudguards, carrier, comfortable riding position.
Other is shiny, looks like the sexy bikes he sees the pros riding on the telly, and is CHEAPER.
Guess which he buys?
2 months later he is on here ........gears too high, backache, toe overlap, you know the rest
It's perhaps endemic of cycling as a sport, rather than mode of transportation in this country. It's a shame pretty much all media (magazines,TdF) outlets represent cycling as some sort out clique in which if you don't know the special handshakes (Campagnolo, Audax etc), you aren't welcome to join.

I think it's this attitude towards cycling, at least amongst cyclists, that is holding back cycling as a whole in this country.
hartleymartin wrote:"Nitto Technomic Stem" - They are very long. In fact you can get 16cm above the minimum insertion mark. They also come in a variety of reach lengths from about 5 to 12cm.
Yes, but they're ugly, normal length quill stems flex enough as it is and seeing as it propels the "ride any size frame, you can always fit one of these" mentalities, ultimately it's part of the problem rather than the cure.
User avatar
hubgearfreak
Posts: 8212
Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 4:14pm

Re: Butterfly bars vs high drops (or narrow butterflys)

Post by hubgearfreak »

Freddie wrote:My feeling is that butterfly bars are too wide and perhaps the wrong shape.

I think it's this attitude towards cycling, at least amongst cyclists, that is holding back cycling as a whole in this country.

normal length quill stems flex enough as it is


your ideal butterfly sounds quite a bit like moustache mars :wink:

you're dead right, and anyone who cycles in anything but normal everday clothes, especially h*lm*ts, clicky shoes and lycra is reinforcing this problem

i've got a nitto stem and don't find it at all flexy. if you've got a bike that you're otherwise delighted with but want to raise the bars/pull them back an inch or two i'd fully recommend one
User avatar
531colin
Posts: 17103
Joined: 4 Dec 2009, 6:56pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: Butterfly bars vs high drops (or narrow butterflys)

Post by 531colin »

hubgearfreak wrote:

you're dead right, and anyone who cycles in anything but normal everday clothes, especially h*lm*ts, clicky shoes and lycra is reinforcing this problem



Wait a minute,....I started saying how difficult it is to sell a useable bike, Freddie says its to do with the portrayal of cycling on the telly, now suddenly its all my fault because somebody might have seen me ride to work in SPD shoes.....WHAT?????
What sort of logic is that?
I repeat....People dont want to buy practical bikes, any more than practical cars. The trouble is, you can use a chelsea tractor as a regular everyday car. You cant use a race bike, or a full suspension bike, as a regular, everyday ride to work.
Bike fitting D.I.Y. .....http://wheel-easy.org.uk/wp-content/upl ... -2017a.pdf
Tracks in the Dales etc...http://www.flickr.com/photos/52358536@N06/collections/
Remember, anything you do (or don't do) to your bike can have safety implications
User avatar
hubgearfreak
Posts: 8212
Joined: 7 Jan 2007, 4:14pm

Re: Butterfly bars vs high drops (or narrow butterflys)

Post by hubgearfreak »

531colin wrote:suddenly its all my fault


it's only an opinion. as for the car analogy, people can be (and are) as uncomfy or as inefficient as they want on both bikes and cars.
User avatar
531colin
Posts: 17103
Joined: 4 Dec 2009, 6:56pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: Butterfly bars vs high drops (or narrow butterflys)

Post by 531colin »

I think its a kind of transport snobbery. You are obliged to use a bicycle as a means of transport if you are really poor, or you are banned from driving. So people who decide to buy a bike decide (either consciously or otherwise) to buy a bike which lets them pretend they are likely to take part in a sporting event, ie racing or mountain biking. A small proportion of such people then discover they actually quite enjoy cycling, then the quest to modify their bike into something more practical begins.

You see a similar thing on the roads. People on horseback may be well off or upper class, and are treated with respect by the average driver. But somebody who rides a bike is seen as a nobody, who cares if I cut him up, he doesn't pay road tax, he has no right to be on the road at all, he should get out of my way.
Bike fitting D.I.Y. .....http://wheel-easy.org.uk/wp-content/upl ... -2017a.pdf
Tracks in the Dales etc...http://www.flickr.com/photos/52358536@N06/collections/
Remember, anything you do (or don't do) to your bike can have safety implications
Freddie
Posts: 2550
Joined: 12 Jan 2008, 12:01pm

Re: Butterfly bars vs high drops (or narrow butterflys)

Post by Freddie »

I agree wholeheartedly with the snobbery thing. This is compounded further by institutional snobbery, "be careful round horses" adverts regularly appear on TV, same for motorbikes (though they are sometimes even worse aggressors and often successful in bringing a lot of danger to themselves), but have you once seen an advert for being safe round bicycles?. They just don't have the same frequency, even though there are probably far more cyclists than horse riders in this country.

It is also known by drivers that a horse could put it's foot through the windscreen if scared, not so with a cyclist, hence we are fair game as the danger is not reciprocated.

There is also a culture for speeding in this country, this is especially prevalent when you move out into the countryside. I know that come nightfall, especially so of a weekend, certain people turn this island into their own private (public?) race course. This, of course, is allowed as who would be out in the lanes at night, not horses, perhaps the odd cyclist or even lower in drivers estimations, the pedestrian that dare use the public highway (I've had drivers pass me at 40mph with literally four inches to spare, when there has been no option but to walk down a country lane).
wrangler_rover
Posts: 183
Joined: 19 Aug 2007, 8:33pm
Location: Welton, near Lincoln

Re: Butterfly bars vs high drops (or narrow butterflys)

Post by wrangler_rover »

I've revently bought a new fixie, Carrera Subway Zero, great bike but the only thing that lets it down in my opinion is the wide handlebars.
It has black riser bars which are 65cm wide, in my opinion much too wide.
I've thought about either buying a set of Bullhorns or hacksawing a few cms off each end of the bars & fitting some stubby bar ends
Post Reply