Re: Which piece of cycling equipment had the greatest impact for
Posted: 28 Aug 2010, 8:07pm
I take this to mean in your cycling lifetime - which for most of us disqualifies pneumatic tyres, frame tubes, the chain and even the wheel.
Some of the things I've considered in coming to an answer pre-date my introduction to cycling in 1958 (see pic of me at Whitby in 1959 on the 1973 thread to see my technological starting point.
) but seem only to have come into general use since then.
In no particular order, things that have made a significant improvement to my cycling experience:
cotterless cranks (same to ride of course, but a lot easier to remove and fit.)
modern fabrics (which seem like magic compared with wool and cotton.)
clipless pedals (which not only locate the feet, as shoeplates did, but allow proper overshoes etc in bad weather)
reliable lighting (hard to overstate how rubbish bike lams used to be)
effective brakes (ditto)
parallelowhatnot gear mechs especially slant parallelograms, as CJ once pointed out to me on here. (Apart from anything else, the push-rod type - if that's the right name - had a depressing tendency to rip all the spokes out if the cable broke.)
decent front mechs (rather than faffing about with a lever at the bottom of the seat tube.)
freehubs and similar systems (much easier to change than many screw-on freewheels and also allowed more gears.)
cycle helmets (gave us all something to talk about
)*
indexed gears (for years I thought this was just a joke.)
combined brake and gear levers (IMO a real improvement on everything that went before.)
My final choice is wide range gears. Probably mainly because I have much less energy than I did in my teens, but also because like many other cyclists I've been forced off the mainly gentle gradients of main roads onto side roads which are often hillier. Not all main roads are flat. of course. The pic I mentioned was taken in Whitby and the only way to pedal out of there on the flat is by pedalo.
* I see that while I have been posting, I see that meic has mentioned helmets, but he overlooked their value as an icebreaker.
Some of the things I've considered in coming to an answer pre-date my introduction to cycling in 1958 (see pic of me at Whitby in 1959 on the 1973 thread to see my technological starting point.
In no particular order, things that have made a significant improvement to my cycling experience:
cotterless cranks (same to ride of course, but a lot easier to remove and fit.)
modern fabrics (which seem like magic compared with wool and cotton.)
clipless pedals (which not only locate the feet, as shoeplates did, but allow proper overshoes etc in bad weather)
reliable lighting (hard to overstate how rubbish bike lams used to be)
effective brakes (ditto)
parallelowhatnot gear mechs especially slant parallelograms, as CJ once pointed out to me on here. (Apart from anything else, the push-rod type - if that's the right name - had a depressing tendency to rip all the spokes out if the cable broke.)
decent front mechs (rather than faffing about with a lever at the bottom of the seat tube.)
freehubs and similar systems (much easier to change than many screw-on freewheels and also allowed more gears.)
cycle helmets (gave us all something to talk about
indexed gears (for years I thought this was just a joke.)
combined brake and gear levers (IMO a real improvement on everything that went before.)
My final choice is wide range gears. Probably mainly because I have much less energy than I did in my teens, but also because like many other cyclists I've been forced off the mainly gentle gradients of main roads onto side roads which are often hillier. Not all main roads are flat. of course. The pic I mentioned was taken in Whitby and the only way to pedal out of there on the flat is by pedalo.
* I see that while I have been posting, I see that meic has mentioned helmets, but he overlooked their value as an icebreaker.