Planning Applications LB/06/02834 and LB/06/02874
Please could CTC members/cyclists offer support for this scheme.
http://www.rbkc.gov.uk/sloanesquare/option1.asp
It will reconfigure the square so that it is less conflict between cyclist and motorised traffic.
Below is the edited text of my letter of support.
I wish to offer my support on behalf of the CTC for the proposal for the reconfiguration of Sloane Square.
I and others attended a presentation that place the scheme in its historical context and the projected influence on traffic behaviour. Also highlighted the spatial benefits that the reconfiguration will provided.
I recognise that with any scheme, there may be some negative impact, but in balance this scheme is worthy of implementation.
I have seen the “Save Sloane Square website at
http://savesloanesquare.co.uk/our_campa ... cation.htm
I found their selective use of facts interesting, giving the impression that a “motorway style” configuration was proposed. I also seen that they suggest that there will be increase risk for pedestrian movement and that visual amenity will be reduced.
I find these arguments flawed.
In my opinion, the reconfiguration will offer increase opportunities for less conflict between traffic on the carriageway and pedestrian on the pavement and their crossing of the carriageway. Also the staged cross road with ameliorate the speed and will aid lane discipline for both cyclist and motorist traffic.
With the introduction of the extension of the congestion zone into this area there is likely to be a reduction in motorised traffic movement, this scheme will enhance the experience for non mortised movements use of Sloane Square.
At the presentation, there was some concern express by the proposal to closure of Holbein Place to through traffic including cyclist. It was suggested that cyclist would ignore the ban, and that in would be self enforcing, with increase in pedestrian flow acting as dynamic traffic calming. I take a similar robust view to that of Councillor Daniel Moylan, in regard to cyclist in pedestrian areas. The flow of pedestrian will regulate the speed of cyclists.
Symons Street is restored to one-way operation in the opposite direction; the view was expressed that it would be helpful if this road could be two way for cyclists. I know that there some logistic difficulty here, but I would welcome that this scheme can encourage cyclist to obey the Highway Code.
The right turn from Cliveden Place into Sloane Street is to be banned; it would be very useful if there were a cyclist exemption to this proposed traffic order.
I have been asked to:
• Publicly endorsing our proposals as beneficial to cyclists (and other road users) in a way that we could quote in our literature.
• Encouraging your members and supporters in Chelsea and Belgravia (essentially SW1, SW3 and SW10) to participate in the consultation by filling in and returning the form.
I am happy to accede to these requests.
Please do publish CTC support in your literature and I will place my comment on the CTC website message forum to encouraging CTC members and supporters to participate in the consultation.
I will also send a copy of this letter via email to Emily Thornberry MP Chair, All Party Cycling Group.
Please do keep me informed of progress on this and any other scheme in RB. Kensington & Chelsea.
Yours sincerely
Philip Benstead
0794-980-1698