Page 2 of 2

Re: Another Criminal Cyclist?

Posted: 7 Feb 2011, 4:01pm
by Guy951
basingstoke123 wrote:Image

Normally this sign is found on signposted cycle routes :)

So THAT'S why I see so many people on BSOs around my local Morrisons.

Mystery solved 8)

Re: Another Criminal Cyclist?

Posted: 7 Feb 2011, 4:22pm
by thirdcrank
basingstoke123 wrote:...Normally this sign is found on signposted cycle routes :)


I'm not sure what point you are making, but that sign is diagram 951 and means that cycling is prohibited.

Re: Another Criminal Cyclist?

Posted: 7 Feb 2011, 4:52pm
by broadway
thirdcrank wrote:
basingstoke123 wrote:...Normally this sign is found on signposted cycle routes :)


I'm not sure what point you are making, but that sign is diagram 951 and means that cycling is prohibited.


Sense of humour failure :D

Re: Another Criminal Cyclist?

Posted: 7 Feb 2011, 6:34pm
by MartinC
TC, it's a well known fact that all the best, most convenient and most used cycle routes are marked with the prohibitory sign. :D There's no point in prohibiting routes that cyclists don't want to use.

Re: Another Criminal Cyclist?

Posted: 7 Feb 2011, 8:48pm
by OldGreyBeard
MartinC wrote:TC, it's a well known fact that all the best, most convenient and most used cycle routes are marked with the prohibitory sign. :D There's no point in prohibiting routes that cyclists don't want to use.



I'd never thought of it like that but it's so true! :lol:

Re: Another Criminal Cyclist?

Posted: 7 Feb 2011, 8:56pm
by KTM690
OldGreyBeard wrote:
MartinC wrote:TC, it's a well known fact that all the best, most convenient and most used cycle routes are marked with the prohibitory sign. :D There's no point in prohibiting routes that cyclists don't want to use.



I'd never thought of it like that but it's so true! :lol:



The application of TRO's (ie prohibiting cycling) is a very blunt instrument. TRO's can be imposed in very flexible ways that wouls still aloow for cycle access at appropriate times.

Take seafront promenades. Often cycling is banned. arguably necescary on busy summer days (tho I see little reason not to have shared use) but is it really needed on a quiet autumn morning when the route would be ideal for cycling to work?

Prohibition of cycling on the pavement should be the exception rather than the rule

Re: Another Criminal Cyclist?

Posted: 7 Feb 2011, 9:29pm
by [XAP]Bob
Who are you and what have you done to KTM690?

:)

Re: Another Criminal Cyclist?

Posted: 8 Feb 2011, 9:24pm
by PRL
MartinC wrote:TC, it's a well known fact that all the best, most convenient and most used cycle routes are marked with the prohibitory sign. :D There's no point in prohibiting routes that cyclists don't want to use.


ISTR one town that made a good cycle network by replacing Red Bicycle signs with Blue ones.