MacBludgeon wrote:Rohloff doesn't seem so expensive now and an Alfine 8 looks very attractive
And the Sram I9 too. Even though mine broke on a tour.
MacBludgeon wrote:Rohloff doesn't seem so expensive now and an Alfine 8 looks very attractive
Brucey wrote:my old SA five speed isn't looking too shabby either....![]()
Oddly enough I don't think for a second that it costs x3 to make an A11 vs an A8. Presumably the reason the A11 costs what it does is because they either thought they could charge that ( it looking like a half-price Rohloff and all...) or that they should charge that much, bearing in mind how many warranty returns they might get....
cheers
jfarnhill wrote:Starting to side with MacBludgeon on either going for an A8 or spending extra for a Rohloff (which, granted, is not guaranteed reliable and can be quite noisy).
Was coming into work this morning and I started getting a slip in high gears. Looked down and it was due to the bellows for the cable being dragged into the groove for the cable on the hub. "I told you so..." was all I could think of, having read a comment further up this thread saying there was the potential for that to happen. Not sure whether this can be addressed so will have a look this evening. It seems like the hub end of the bellows is gripping more than the chainstay end and I'm not even sure whether the chainstay end grips at all. When the bellows gets fully compressed when you're in the lowest gear then it pushes the hub end up the cable, leading rather inevitably to it fouling in the cable channel when you move to a high gear. Any advice/guidance appreciate from those who can make this work.
Meshuga wrote:I will post images of how I have my Alfine 11 setup.
rofan wrote:Meshuga wrote:I will post images of how I have my Alfine 11 setup.
Did you truncate the shifting cable(s)?
Asking because of the well known 184mm
Thanks
Brucey wrote:FWIW that is what I have thought as well; I think the 184mm is just to get it within range of the barrel adjuster.
BTW some folk regard some oil leakage as 'normal' on these hubs; back to Sturmey Archer 'total loss' lubrication, then....
cheers
ukdodger wrote:Which makes you wonder why they sell a gadget to exactly measure the 184mm's.