Singlespeed gearing - help!

General cycling advice ( NOT technical ! )
Post Reply
Berniethebike
Posts: 239
Joined: 14 Jun 2007, 8:54pm

Singlespeed gearing - help!

Post by Berniethebike »

Hi all,
I'm going to change my 90s Giant Peloton to a single speed - not sure why - I just want to try it! I know this is entirely personal but I want to get some idea before I change it and get it wrong!!
I live in South Lakes/Kendal area so it's pretty hilly and wanted to get an idea of the number of inches people would recommend?
I'm thinking of somewhere in the mid 60s to early 70s interms of inches......any thoughts?

Cheers

Bernie
User avatar
gaz
Posts: 14650
Joined: 9 Mar 2007, 12:09pm
Location: Kent

Single speed gearing.

Post by gaz »

.
Last edited by gaz on 20 Feb 2025, 9:19pm, edited 1 time in total.
Berniethebike
Posts: 239
Joined: 14 Jun 2007, 8:54pm

Post by Berniethebike »

Freewheel definately.
User avatar
meic
Posts: 19355
Joined: 1 Feb 2007, 9:37pm
Location: Caerfyrddin (Carmarthen)

Post by meic »

How about trying one of your favourite rides and seeing which is the highest of your present gears that you can get around your ride on. If there is an exceptional steep bit that you would walk up instead then do so and dont count that stretch.
I personally couldnt ride with more than 30-40 inch in my area! However I appreciate part of the point of the exercise is to stretch such abilities.
User avatar
DaveP
Posts: 3333
Joined: 9 Mar 2007, 4:20pm
Location: W Mids

Post by DaveP »

Hmmm. I thought the idea of using single speed was to choose a gear low enough to spin in :lol:
Use your exisiting gears to home in on a ratio that you can get around in without straining. Your knees will thank you!
User avatar
Si
Moderator
Posts: 15191
Joined: 5 Jan 2007, 7:37pm

Post by Si »

It's a difficult one to advise on as the ideal gearing will vary depending upon different rider's power outputs and fitness.

I've got my road going SS set up with 63inch gear. My choice is based upon being an, at best, average climber who lives in a moderatly flat to rolling area. If it were fixed I'd probably have it a little higher so that I didn't spin out on down hills, but with the SS I can coast down so can have a slightly lower gear to get me up the hills. I reckon that I can probably stagger up the odd bit of 1 in 7 with this but wouldn't want to be on a long ride with loads of steep stuff.

My MTB SS is around 55inch - this is OK for short bits of road work as long as I don't want to get anywhere fast but would do my head in on a ride of any length.
twicewithchips
Posts: 32
Joined: 28 Jan 2007, 3:03pm

Post by twicewithchips »

Although the real answer seems to be 'it depends', my 2p says that mid 60s to low 70s is about right. Some of this depends on the fixed/free decision - you don't have to keep up with the freewheel going down the other side, so can get away with a lower gear. I commute on fixed 48 x 19 which seems to suit, and got to it pretty much by trial and error (South Yorkshire and the Peak Disitrict). Go for the biggest gear you can push up the steepest hill round about and that'll probably be a good start, but expect to want a bigger gear after a while.

For a free I'd go for lower than that, but suspect it would probably depend on what was in the shed at the time. If you are converting a casette hub, a Surly singulator (or equivalent) will let you run just one cog on the middle of the casette. The advantage of course being that you can work through the whole casette to find the best cog to use.
Berniethebike
Posts: 239
Joined: 14 Jun 2007, 8:54pm

Post by Berniethebike »

Well thanks guys - this is all great stuff.
Never heard of a Surly Singulator before - sounds like a bad-tempered teenager to me!
I'll research!
Cheers
Bernie
User avatar
Si
Moderator
Posts: 15191
Joined: 5 Jan 2007, 7:37pm

Post by Si »

Unless they've redesigned it, I'd avoid a singulator as the spring is prone to failure. I used a Tension Seeker and found it much better.

Also, I'd be wary of trying to make up for crap chain line with a tensioner at the rear unless you fit a mech or retainer to the front too!
loiner
Posts: 49
Joined: 28 May 2007, 8:31pm
Location: Yorkshire

Post by loiner »

anything above 70 would be too big for me in your neck of the woods
May rhe wind be always at your back
twicewithchips
Posts: 32
Joined: 28 Jan 2007, 3:03pm

Post by twicewithchips »

Sorry, didn't mean a singulator at all, riding with a freewheel has addled my brains.

I thought I was talking about one of these:
One One Singlespeed Converter Kit

http://www.on-one.co.uk/index.php?module=pagemaster&PAGE_user_op=view_page&PAGE_id=74&MMN_position=80:80

dunno if there's a shimano 7 or campag version available elsewhere though.

Looks to me like you'll get 2mm each way to play with your chainline if you need it. If you've got vertical dropouts you might want a tensioner of some sort (note Si's comments), or a lot of luck with a magic gear (Sheldon being your man there I suspect). All kinda depends on the parts available, but human ingenuity never ceases to amaze me.
User avatar
piedwagtail91
Posts: 258
Joined: 23 Jan 2007, 9:18pm

Post by piedwagtail91 »

i came down the lakes and though kendal on our club 200 in 24 at the weekend. i was on fixed of 47 x 20 or 63.5 and found it just about right for dunmail and the climb out of keswick on the A591,we follwed the A591 to kendal through burnside and the gear seemed just about right on the climbs. i had been using 48 x 20 which although not a lot different on paper made hills a tiny bit easier.
i think anything around this would be a good starting point.
glueman
Posts: 4354
Joined: 16 Mar 2007, 1:22pm

Post by glueman »

About 62" for a freewheel, 67" on fixed. You can gear lower with the freewheel because you won't be spinning out downhill.
Post Reply