Pinnacle vs Scott vs Other
Posted: 6 May 2014, 8:41am
Firstly, let me apologise if this sort of question is a forum faux pas, but I'd like some advice and opinions over a couple of bike choices. Any help would be appreciated.
I'm looking to get back in to cycling, for commuting (10 miles round trip 4 days a week) and fitness. I'll be mainly on tarmac, but would also like the option to go on light trails, as I live by the lovely Formby Pine Woods.
I've never been a fan of drop bars and was therefore looking for a hybrid bike, with straight bars.
After an initial bit of research and a trip to my local Evans, I've chosen two models that I liked and fitted well.
These are:
Scott Sub Speed 30
http://www.evanscycles.com/products/scott/sub-speed-30-2014-hybrid-bike-ec056055

and
Pinnacle (Evans own brand) Neon Three
http://www.evanscycles.com/products/pinnacle/neon-three-2014-hybrid-bike-ec054679

So far I've worked out some advantages and disadvantages:
Scott Advantages:
- Respected Brand Name (cool factor *ego*)
- MTB drivetrain (diversity over wider terrain)
- Hydraulic Disc Brakes
- Wider Tyres (35 vs 28, better for trail)
- Looks nicer (in my opinion)
Scott Disadvantages:
- Weight (12.2kg vs 9.75kg)
- Slightly lower spec (if it was comparable? Altus/Acera vs Sora)
- Alloy fork
Pinnacle Advantages:
- Weight (9.75kg vs 12.2kg)
- Slightly cheaper (£550 vs £599)
- Carbon Fork
- Higher spec (Sora vs Altus/Acera)
Pinnacle Disadvantages:
- Not well known brand (ego)
- Road Drivetrain (will it handle light trails?)
- Narrow Tyres (will they handle light trails?)
- Mini V-Brakes (vs Hydraulic Discs)
- Less choice for upgrade
Which bike would you choose for my purpose, and why? Or do you have any other suggestions (around the £600 price range)? I'd even consider a 29er if it had lockout! Just can't seem to find one I like for that price!
Thanks in advance, and I hope to update this forum at a later date with full review of whichever bike I do eventually get!
I'm looking to get back in to cycling, for commuting (10 miles round trip 4 days a week) and fitness. I'll be mainly on tarmac, but would also like the option to go on light trails, as I live by the lovely Formby Pine Woods.
I've never been a fan of drop bars and was therefore looking for a hybrid bike, with straight bars.
After an initial bit of research and a trip to my local Evans, I've chosen two models that I liked and fitted well.
These are:
Scott Sub Speed 30
http://www.evanscycles.com/products/scott/sub-speed-30-2014-hybrid-bike-ec056055

and
Pinnacle (Evans own brand) Neon Three
http://www.evanscycles.com/products/pinnacle/neon-three-2014-hybrid-bike-ec054679

So far I've worked out some advantages and disadvantages:
Scott Advantages:
- Respected Brand Name (cool factor *ego*)
- MTB drivetrain (diversity over wider terrain)
- Hydraulic Disc Brakes
- Wider Tyres (35 vs 28, better for trail)
- Looks nicer (in my opinion)
Scott Disadvantages:
- Weight (12.2kg vs 9.75kg)
- Slightly lower spec (if it was comparable? Altus/Acera vs Sora)
- Alloy fork
Pinnacle Advantages:
- Weight (9.75kg vs 12.2kg)
- Slightly cheaper (£550 vs £599)
- Carbon Fork
- Higher spec (Sora vs Altus/Acera)
Pinnacle Disadvantages:
- Not well known brand (ego)
- Road Drivetrain (will it handle light trails?)
- Narrow Tyres (will they handle light trails?)
- Mini V-Brakes (vs Hydraulic Discs)
- Less choice for upgrade
Which bike would you choose for my purpose, and why? Or do you have any other suggestions (around the £600 price range)? I'd even consider a 29er if it had lockout! Just can't seem to find one I like for that price!
Thanks in advance, and I hope to update this forum at a later date with full review of whichever bike I do eventually get!