I stumbled across this site this morning
http://www.wd40bike.com/
So no doubt the issue can now be resolved?
Happy Cycling. (Personally, a TF2 user)
yakdiver wrote:I've been using WD 40 on my chain for years and I get around 6500 miles per chain, I think a lot of people are saying that it is not a lubricant are just repeating what other people have said before without even using it themselves, and YES I do know what the WD stands for.
Good luck with it.yakdiver wrote:I've been using WD 40 on my chain for years and I get around 6500 miles per chain, I think a lot of people are saying that it is not a lubricant are just repeating what other people have said before without even using it themselves, and YES I do know what the WD stands for.
don1 wrote:Although GT85 is my favourite, if not just because of the smell.
willcee wrote:well.. in many good LBS, Stateside, you'll find a wall with a huge sign in a prominent position stating ....WD40 IS NOT A LUBRICANT!!!.....
DavidT wrote:Over the years I've followed with interest the extensive discussions and POV on here about whether WD-40 is an effective lube or not.
I stumbled across this site this morning
http://www.wd40bike.com/
So no doubt the issue can now be resolved?![]()
Happy Cycling. (Personally, a TF2 user)